March 21, 2010

Bob Molinaro clued us in, again, on Hampton about the women’s basketball team from UConn:

“How often do any of us have an opportunity to see the best perform up close and in person?
Hampton Roads gets that chance when the Connecticut women’s basketball team rolls into Old Dominion’s Ted Constant Convocation Center on Sunday.
Geno Auriemma’s juggernaut is here for the start of the NCAA tournament (a.k.a. The UConn Invitational).
In three weeks, the Huskies will cut down the nets after winning their second consecutive national title and extending the program’s winning streak to 78 games.
We could hedge, but why bother?
In its own realm, UConn is as glamorous as the Los Angeles Lakers and as dominant as the Harlem Globetrotters. Auriemma continues to insist that he’s “baffled” by his team’s spotless record. Apparently, he’s the only one.
It’s not as if UConn has been squeaking by; the team’s margin of victory this season is 34.8 points. During their 72-game streak, the Huskies have won every game by double digits. This year, they’ve been able to win by three and four touchdowns because they limit opponents to an average shooting percentage of 30.5.
UConn is to women’s basketball what “Avatar” is to movie revenues. The Huskies put every other program in the shade.
For the time being, that includes Tennessee. Pat Summitt’s team won the national title as recently as two years go, but relatively speaking, they’ve become an afterthought because of UConn.
Perhaps this isn’t the best advertisement for the sport, but that’s not
UConn’s problem, now is it?
And while UConn dominates like no other team ever has, the Huskies don’t do it in a way that suggests an attitude of entitlement.
In 6-foot junior forward Maya Moore, they feature last year’s national Player of the Year, while 6-foot-4 senior center Tina Charles is expected to win this
season’s honor.
But unlike some of Auriemma’s previous national champions (he’s going for his seventh crown), UConn isn’t an assembly line of All-Americans. And its bench isn’t the best, either.
In Sports Illustrated, Oklahoma coach Sherri Coale tried to explain UConn’s dominance.
“The magic of Connecticut,” she said, “lies in how hard they play.”
In running out to a 33-0 record this season, UConn has proven to have everything but decent competition. Now the team’s special aura is saving ODU’s tournament. As of Friday afternoon, about 5,500 tickets to the sub-regional already had been sold.
That’s about 75 percent capacity at the Constant Center, but even before the additional walk-up sales that are expected, it’s a far healthier turnstile count than most other sites will enjoy.
It’s no secret that the women’s tournament doesn’t draw well. Not in the early rounds, at least. Without the home team in the NCAAs – Wendy Larry’s Lady
Monarchs had to settle for the WNIT – ODU feared that a lackluster field would give prospective customers more of an excuse to stay home.
Even after her team failed to reach the NCAAs, Larry was on the radio trying to move tickets. Too many vacant seats would have been embarrassing. It also would have cost ODU money.
Each request to the NCAA to host the tournament requires attendance projections, which if not met results in a financial hit for the school.
Any school that doesn’t pull in the gate receipts that were guaranteed to the NCAA must make up the difference. That stopped being an issue for ODU once UConn was slotted for the Constant Center.
Elsewhere, it will be a different story. There are 16 sites for the first two rounds of the tournament. Last year, 11 didn’t reach their economic goals. Some schools lost between $30,000 and $40,000.
You can see why ODU feels like it won the lottery with UConn. In their world, Geno’s players are rock stars. And like “Avatar,” the Huskies live up to the
Now that they’re here, it seems appropriate that the home of the Monarchs would open its doors to basketball royalty.”

Thomas Boswell, of The DC Post, had this to say about Redskins’ coach Mike Shanahan’s directing the Redskins’ steep climb toward respectability.

“As Mike Shanahan and Joe Gibbs reminisced about the only time they had met as head coaches, back in 2005 in Denver.
“We were trailing, had to go for two points; it was raining, just classic, both teams battling their guts out,” Gibbs said. Then the former Redskins coach
remembered the outcome of the game. “I’m not sure I ever beat you in anything,” Gibbs said to Shanahan. “I still remember those 28 points in the second quarter,” said Shanahan, referring to the Redskins’ victory team on which Shanahan was an assistant coach.
That was the scene the Redskins staged for their fans and media: a mutual-congratulation feast meant to link the best of the team’s past with its highest hopes for the future. That’s valid. Recently, the Redskins have shown signs of wanting to change their ways and mend some fences.
But more explicitly, placing Shanahan beside Gibbs shows how hard it is to fix a team that has become a major mess. Gibbs won three Super Bowls, but when he came back to town in ’04, even he couldn’t accomplish the task.
Gibbs inherited Steve Spurrier’s 5-11 disaster, and in four years, despite the money owner Daniel Snyder threw at problems, Joe still had a losing record.
Gibbs got almost every player he asked for as well as new coordinators on both sides of the ball. By the end, all he had to do was orchestrate. But still, when once an NFL team has been truly broken, as the Redskins were the past two years under Jim Zorn, former general manager Vinny Cerrato and Snyder, it takes years to mend.
These days, the Redskins are trying to re-brand themselves in the minds of their disgruntled fan base. Who better to be general manager than Bruce Allen, whose father led the team to its first Super Bowl? Shanahan had the best résumé of the glamour coaches who returned to the NFL this year, so grab him.
Gibbs’s arrival Wednesday, for a banquet for his charity, was another benediction on the Redskins’ latest fresh start.
“Like all of us who are Redskin fans — and I’m Fan No. 1 now — I’m all excited,” said Gibbs. “Dan did a great job in hiring Mike. He’s a proven product in
the NFL.
“I wanted to let Mike know what I thought he had in Dan. He has a burning desire to win. He’s one of the owners that pays a price. I never had any excuses.”
So, back to you, Mike: Perfect owner, great city, insane fans, unlimited budget, no excuses (and a 4-12 team). Have fun.
“You embrace those standards that Joe set,” said Shanahan, adding that Redskins fans “expect perfection.”
That’s the irony, isn’t it? Joe set the standards. Then nobody who came after him could meet them. Not even Joe.
For many years it has been obvious that the Redskins needed to rebuild over several seasons. But the team’s fans want the product fixed instantly.
Perhaps Gibbs knows better than anybody what Shanahan is about to face.
“When you first come in, nothing is easy about it,” said Gibbs. “The turnover from one head coach to the next is big. You have to go through a process of
evaluating everybody to see if they fit with what you want to do . . . Picking people is one of the hardest things in the world.
“The life span of a player in the NFL is only four years, so there’s always a lot of turnover anyway. Also, your scheme is probably different, too. [If] they’re
switching from a 4-3 defense to a 3-4 defense, that’s a huge change”
Slowly, Shanahan is putting his imprint on the team.
“It’s not a sprint,” said the new coach with the two Super Bowl rings from his days in Denver. “It takes a lot of hard work.”
On Wednesday, Shanahan took another of his deliberate steps. The Redskins  presumably to provide a backup quarterback who knows the offensive system of new coordinator Kyle Shanahan.
“We want competition,” said Shanahan, referring to all positions, including quarterback. “Grossman has a year in the system.”
What Grossman’s addition really shows is Shanahan’s ability to increase his options — an essential gift when rebuilding a team.
If the Redskins take an offensive tackle such as Russell Okung of Oklahoma State with the fourth overall draft pick next month, then they have protection at quarterback as well as the possibility of Grossman, who led the Bears to the Super Bowl in ’06, actually winning the job.
However, what if a quarterback the Redskins covet, like Sam Bradford, is still available with that fourth pick? Then you could grab him, try to trade Campbell and still have Grossman as a security blanket in case the kid quarterback develops slowly.
Shanahan’s biggest problem is that quarterback is merely one of myriad questions about his team. Asked about the retirement of left tackle Chris Samuels, a six-time Pro Bowler, Shanahan said, “Everybody would agree it’s important to have a left tackle. And a right tackle, a left guard, a right guard and a center.”
After the chuckling stopped, the reality of the remark set in. Shanahan doesn’t just need a lineman. He needs almost a whole offensive line. Artis Hicks, the
first free agent the Redskins signed this offseason, wasn’t even a fulltime starter at any one position in Minnesota, but more a line utility man.
“Sometimes you have to find a way to get it done without a superstar like Chris,” said Shanahan.
When Gibbs and Shanahan talk, one name clearly comes up a lot: Snyder.
“What did you major in?” Gibbs asked Shanahan.
“Physical education,” the new coach said.
“Me, too. When things went wrong, Dan would say, ‘I’m surrounded by P.E. majors,’ ” Gibbs recalled. “I’d be tempted to say, ‘At least I graduated from
college.’ But then I realized he dropped out and became a billionaire.'”
Shanahan thought for a second. Perhaps no Redskins coach will ever have the homespun ease, and the leverage with an owner, that Gibbs possessed with
Snyder. How will Shanahan, so respected but faced with such a busted machine, fit into this complex world of high expectations and constant reshaping of franchise identity?
“My ‘P.E.’ stands for ‘Petroleum Engineering,’ ” Shanahan said, deadpan.
Good idea. Stick with that.”


Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )


Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: